Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
Independent side-by-side comparison — trust scores, security compliance, legal risk, and community signals.
Sourcegraph Cody
2026-W14
32/100
EXTENDEDEVALUATION
★ WINNER
VS
Windsurf
2026-W14
8/100
AVOID
Trust & Risk Scores
| Category | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 32/100 | 8/100 | ◀ |
| Security Score | 88/100 | 30/100 | ◀ |
| Legal Risk Score | 25/100 | 95/100 | ◀ |
| Financial Stability | 25/100 | 35/100 | ▶ |
| Integration Score | 60/100 | 85/100 | ▶ |
Compliance & Security
| Certification / Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ✅ | ✅ | = |
| ISO 27001 | ✅ | ❌ | ◀ |
| GDPR | ✅ | ⚠️ | ◀ |
| HIPAA | ✅ | ✅ | = |
| SSO | ✅ | ✅ | = |
| IP Indemnification | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
Community Signals
| Signal | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Mentions | 45 | 20 | ◀ |
| Negative Mentions | 20 | 45 | ◀ |
Pros & Cons
Sourcegraph Cody
✅ Pros
- Unparalleled code intelligence and context awareness for large, multi-repository codebases.
- Strong portfolio of enterprise-grade security certifications (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP).
- Offers self-hosting options for maximum data control.
❌ Cons
- Critical vendor stability risk due to corporate split and pivot to a new product ('Amp').
- Unacceptable legal and IP risks in the standard Terms of Service (ambiguous data training, no IP indemnification).
- Opaque, enterprise-only pricing model with high potential for cost factors that may not be immediately visible in initial pricing.
- Weaker code generation capabilities compared to market leaders.
Windsurf
✅ Pros
- Strong underlying technology with good integration capabilities via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
- Well-regarded VS Code extension with a large historical install base (though this is a lagging indicator).
❌ Cons
- Punitive, unpredictable, and opaque pricing model.
- Complete lack of a legal framework (Terms of Service page is a 404 error).
- Unaddressed security incidents involving malicious extensions.
- Non-existent customer support and vendor communication.
- Extreme vendor instability and high risk of further disruptive changes or service termination.
- Massive loss of community trust and active user migration to competitors.
Segment Fit
| Segment | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Startup (1–50) | Caution | Caution |
| Midmarket (50–500) | Caution | Caution |
| Enterprise (500+) | Caution | Caution |
📋 Our Assessment
Sourcegraph Cody leads this comparison with a trust score of 32/100 vs 8/100.
For security-conscious teams, Sourcegraph Cody has the stronger compliance posture (88/100 vs 30/100).
Read full reports: Sourcegraph Cody Report → | Windsurf Report →