01Trust Score

Tabnine

Week 2026-W17 · 26 Apr 2026 Vendor-Neutral
33 /100 Significant Risk
▼ 11 pts ⚠
2.2/5 (3652)
↓ PDF Report
AUDITOR SUMMARY
Strength: Tabnine offers robust enterprise features including flexible deployment (on-prem, air-gapped), explicit zero data retention, and no training on customer code, which aligns with strict data privacy requirements.
Trust Score 33/100 EVALUATE
Est. Annual Cost $73,800/year for 100 users 100 users / yr
Top Risk HIGH Reliability Overall: High
Priority Action Critical CVE Risk Tier Reported by Scraper ↓ PDF  · TCO  · Hardening

Enterprise Verdict

× Extended Due Diligence Required
Risk: High 50 sources
Key Strength

Detailed community analysis available in report body

Priority Action

Critical CVE Risk Tier Reported by Scraper

This report updates every week. Weekly AI vendor intelligence — trust scores, contract red flags, competitive shifts.
02Top Risks

Risk Assessment

Seven-category enterprise risk analysis derived from community and vendor signals. Each card shows the evidence tier and the underlying finding.

High Reliability Community Data

Vendor viability score: 58/100. No community-reported outages or reliability incidents found in recent data.

High Cost Predictability Community Data

Vendor financial stability score: 58/100. Total funding raised: $60M+. Enterprises should negotiate fixed-rate contracts and monitor pricing changes.

High Vendor Lock-in Community Data

Data export status unclear. Integration score: 25/100. Webhooks available, reducing lock-in risk.

High Data Privacy Community Data

Compliance score: 54/100. GDPR: dpa_in_progress. Encryption at rest: unknown.

Medium Compliance Posture Community Data

SOC 2: none. ISO 27001: none. Overall compliance score: 54/100.

Verified — Confirmed by vendor documentation Community — Derived from community reports

Due Diligence Alerts

Priority reviews, recommended inquiries, and verified strengths — based on 44+ community data points

Recommended Inquiry Critical Critical CVE Risk Tier Reported by Scraper

The scraper indicates a critical CVE risk tier with 8 active CVEs for Tabnine. This requires immediate investigation and a detailed remediation plan from the vendor.

Recommended Inquiry High No Public SOC 2 Certification Documented

Tabnine buyers may want to verify availability of publicly available SOC 2 certification, which is a critical requirement for enterprise vendor assessment. A manual security audit is necessary.

Recommended Inquiry High Opaque Data Retention Policy

The vendor's privacy policy does not specify data retention periods, posing a significant compliance risk for regulated data.

Recommended Inquiry High DPA Status 'In Progress'

The DPA is not fully available and is listed as 'in progress', which is a legal and compliance blocker for GDPR-regulated entities.

03Security & Compliance

Security & Compliance

SOC 2 ✕ Not found
ISO 27001 Not documented
GDPR ⏳ In Progress
HIPAA ✕ Not found

Data Security

Encryption (At Rest): unknown
Encryption (In Transit): TLS 1.2

Security Features

SSO SAML, OAuth
MFA Methods not specified in public documentation
Audit Logs

IT Hardening Guide

Critical Settings

Deployment Model (SaaS/VPC/On-Prem/Air-gapped)
medium For maximum control and data sovereignty, deploy Tabnine on-premises or in an air-gapped environment, especially for highly regulated data. If SaaS, ensure VPC deployment with strict network controls.
Enterprise Context Engine Configuration
medium Carefully configure the Enterprise Context Engine to control which repositories, documentation, and APIs Tabnine can access. Implement granular permissions to prevent over-privileging.
LLM Choice and Token Usage Controls
medium Implement policies for developers to select approved LLMs. Monitor token usage closely to manage costs and prevent unexpected overages, especially with the 5% handling fee for third-party LLMs.
SSO Integration
medium Enforce SSO for all user authentication to centralize identity management and leverage existing MFA policies. Integrate with corporate IdP (e.g., Azure AD, Okta).

Deployment Checklist

Enterprise Contract Intelligence

DPA availability, data residency, and contract risk signals for procurement teams

📄 Data Processing Agreement Not Public

The DPA is listed as 'in progress' and is not publicly available. Procurement teams must request a signed DPA directly from the vendor before contract execution to ensure GDPR compliance.

🌐 Data Residency Vendor-Controlled
Default: US (AWS)

While Tabnine claims flexible deployment options including on-prem and air-gapped, the scraper indicates EU hosting is not available, and the primary region is US. Data residency options are not publicly documented for SaaS deployments, which is a procurement blocker for EU/regulated customers requiring data sovereignty.

⚠️ Contract Risk Medium Lock-in (65/100)
Data export on exit: No ⚠
⚠ 4 contract risk flags — click to review
⚠ Opaque data retention policy increases compliance risk.
⚠ Lack of explicit data export guarantees for custom context data.
⚠ Potential for variable LLM token costs and handling fees.
⚠ Absence of public SOC 2 certification complicates vendor risk assessment.

The contract risk is medium due to deep integration capabilities and the proprietary Enterprise Context Engine, which could lead to vendor lock-in. Opaque data retention and lack of explicit data portability on exit are significant concerns. Auto-renewal and unilateral change clauses are not publicly documented and require review in the full contract. The variable pricing for LLM tokens introduces cost unpredictability.

New risk signals detected weekly. Weekly AI vendor intelligence — trust scores, contract red flags, competitive shifts.
04Community Signals

Community Evidence

Sentiment analysis and recurring issues from developer & enterprise community signals this week.

📊

Community signals processed. Detailed source highlights will be available in the next report update.

05Financial Impact

Financial Impact Panel

Cost intelligence and pricing signals for enterprise procurement decisions

Pricing data from public sources — enterprise rates differ. Verify with vendor.

TCO Calculator

Pricing Not Available

Enterprise pricing information could not be obtained for this vendor. This may be due to custom/private pricing models or limited publicly available data.

Don't evaluate blind next quarter. Weekly AI vendor intelligence — trust scores, contract red flags, competitive shifts.

Independent analysis — signals aggregated from GitHub, Reddit, HN, Stack Overflow, Twitter/X, G2 & Capterra. Not affiliated with any vendor. Corrections?

Download PDF Report

Create a free account to download the full enterprise audit PDF.

Sign up — it's free →

Already have an account? Log in